Ryzen 5 2600 vs. Core i5-8400: 36 Game Benchmark > Putting It All Together

Putting It All Together

Ok, that was a massive session. Then now let's put it all together with a expect at the average performance across the 36 games tested, permit's do that first.

Starting with the 720p results where we had the least chance of being GPU limited, we come across that the Core i5-8400 was on average 13% faster than the stock Ryzen 5 2600. That's not a huge margin only noteworthy plenty. The frame time performance was closer but fifty-fifty here the 8400 was nonetheless x% faster. Overclocking did manus Ryzen the reward and now the 2600 was vii% faster for the 1% low result and five% faster for the average frame rate.

Moving to 1080p we see all margins reduced and here overclocking only provided a 13% operation increase and this meant the 2600 was 7% faster than the 8400 for the 1% depression result and simply 3% for the average frame rate. As expected the margins continued to shrink every bit the resolution increased and at 1440p there is very little divergence between the iii configurations.

The Cadre i5-8400 was faster in more games out of the box but starts to lose out once the Ryzen five 2600's overclocked. And then which 1 is better? Adjacent question, please. Seriously, this is a hard one to settle, but hither goes nothing.

For those gaming exclusively, the Intel Core i5-8400 is arguably the better option. It's certainly more cost effective and requires far less messing around to achieve the operation shown in this commodity.

The reason I often pick the Ryzen 5 2600 over the Core i5-8400 is because it'southward a ameliorate all-rounder, it offers noticeably better operation in core heavy workloads and for the near part gaming operation is duplicate since y'all're almost e'er GPU spring and nosotros come across this when looking at the 1440p results using the mighty GTX 1080 Ti.

The overclocked Ryzen five 2600 outscores the Cadre i5 by a sixty% margin in Cinebench, is 34% faster in Blender and decompresses athenaeum using 7-Zip upwards to 70% faster. Even stock at that place are few productivity workloads where the 6-core/6-thread Core i5 can beat or even match the six-core/12-thread R5 2600.

But when information technology comes to games the Core i5-8400 simply gets it done with less fuss. To replicate the operation seen in this commodity you simply need a basic B360 board, some low latency DDR4-2666 retention, and well... a GTX 1080 Ti, but you lot get the point. It'southward also possible to squeeze another 5-10% out of the 8400 by using a Z370 motherboard and DDR4-3200 memory, though those gains are but realized with a high-end graphics card.

The stock out of the box Ryzen 5 2600 performance tin be achieved for roughly the same price as the budget Core i5-8400 build, and given the Intel CPU was faster overall this makes it the better value choice for gamers.

The overclocked configuration will require an upgraded cooler, but for the results shown here yous'll likewise need a quality motherboard and premium Samsung B-die memory. I priced all this up and you'll exist paying ~$420 for the Cadre i5-8400 platform, while the overclocked Ryzen build is more than like $500 with a basic air-cooler.

And then if you're strictly gaming the twenty% cost premium of the overclocked Ryzen build can't be hands justified for a 7% average proceeds. Alternatively, you could spend $500 on the Coffee Lake build and get the 8600K with a bones air cooler, enable MCE, and you lot've got an unstoppable gaming rig.

But, if y'all exercise other things too gaming so the Ryzen shines and the premium is easily justified. Personally I'd go for the Ryzen 5 2600 equally I play games but also create video content and the time savings every mean solar day encoding volition certainly add up. And that'southward it for this one, y'all should now be armed with all the facts yous demand to brand an informed purchase, and then good luck.

Shopping Shortcuts: